Both types of systems do a good job — the question isn't which is "more modern," but which fits your site, your budget and your growth plans.
When a client orders a video surveillance system, the first technical question is almost always the same: IP cameras or an analog system (AHD, CVI, TVI)? There's no universal answer — it depends on the site, the existing infrastructure, and how much you expect the system to grow over time.
The wrong choice rarely shows on installation day. It surfaces months later: when the footage isn't sharp enough to read a license plate, when the archive holds only a few days, or when you want to add a camera and there is no spare cable. That is why the choice is a decision for the whole life of the system, not just the price of the first camera.
IP cameras process the image right inside the camera and send it as a digital stream over a network cable (usually with PoE — power delivered over the same cable) or over Wi-Fi. The recording device (NVR) receives a ready digital stream, which allows for higher resolution and more flexible processing — zone-based motion detection, object recognition, integration with third-party software.
Analog systems (AHD/CVI/TVI) transmit the signal over a coaxial cable to a recording device (DVR), which digitizes it. These technologies have advanced significantly over the years and today support resolutions up to 4K – 8MP, but the "smart" processing still happens mainly in the DVR rather than in the camera.
An important clarification: today's "analog" has little in common with the old blurry cameras of twenty years ago. AHD, CVI and TVI are three separate standards for HD video over coax, and a camera of one standard does not automatically work with a recorder of another, although many modern hybrid recorders recognize several formats. With IP cameras, compatibility between manufacturers is usually helped by the ONVIF standard — look for it in the specification, but it does not guarantee that every feature will work with a third-party recorder.
In an analog system, two conductors run to each camera: a coaxial cable for the video signal and a power cable, often combined in one "siamese" cable. The cameras run on direct current (typically 12 V) from a central power supply or from a separate adapter. On long runs the voltage drops along the wires, and the camera may restart or behave unreliably — especially at night, when the infrared illumination switches on. That is why wire gauge and cable quality matter more than they seem.
In an IP system everything runs over a single UTP cable (Cat5e or Cat6). Ethernet has a standard limit of about 100 meters per segment; for longer distances you add an intermediate switch, an extender, or a fiber link. PoE under the IEEE 802.3af and 802.3at standards delivers roughly 15 and 30 W respectively from the switch port, which is enough for most fixed cameras. PTZ (pan-tilt-zoom) cameras or cameras with heaters may need more — also check the switch's total power budget.
Two practical notes. First, don't use cheap copper-clad aluminum (CCA) cable, especially for PoE — its resistance is higher and on long runs it causes losses and overheating. Second, cable for outdoor runs must be rated for outdoor use and the connections protected from moisture; this applies to both types of systems.
Resolution is expressed in megapixels: 2MP is 1920×1080 (Full HD), 4MP is about 2560×1440, and 8MP is 3840×2160 (4K). The number alone, however, doesn't tell you whether you'll be able to recognize a person or a license plate. That depends on three things: how many pixels fall on the subject, how much light there is, and how aggressively the recording is compressed.
The first is a matter of geometry. A wide-angle lens covers a large area, but each pixel represents a bigger piece of the scene. If you need to recognize faces or plates, you need a camera with a narrower field of view aimed at a specific zone, not one "all-seeing" camera on the ceiling.
The second is light. A larger sensor and a faster lens give a cleaner picture in the evening; at the same sensor size, more megapixels means smaller pixels and often weaker low-light performance. Infrared illumination produces a black-and-white image and has a limited range; when the camera is mounted behind glass, it reflects off the window and blinds the camera. Cameras with white-light illumination give a color night image, but the light is visible. Backlight — an entrance with bright sun outside — calls for a camera with wide dynamic range (WDR). All of this is a property of the model, not of the technology: a good analog camera can beat a weak IP camera of the same resolution.
Analog cameras record to a DVR (today often a hybrid recorder that accepts several analog formats), while IP cameras record to an NVR. In both cases the size of the archive is determined by four things: the number of cameras, the stream bitrate, the recording mode, and the retention period. The math is simple: one megabit per second of continuous recording is about 10.8 GB per day. At an assumed bitrate of 4 Mbit/s that is about 43 GB per day per camera; for eight cameras recording continuously for 30 days, you get about 10 TB. This illustrates the arithmetic and is not a recommendation — the real bitrate depends on resolution, frames per second, the scene (an empty corridor or a busy street) and the codec.
The codec matters a lot. H.265 keeps similar quality at a significantly lower bitrate than H.264, which means fewer disks or a longer archive. The price is a higher processing load and the need for both the camera and the recorder to support it. Motion-only recording also saves space, but it risks missing the moment before an event — look for a pre-record function and use continuous recording at key points.
For the disks themselves, use surveillance-grade models designed for continuous writing. The recorder should be kept in a locked place: if a thief takes the recording device, the cameras are worthless. It is sensible to put the recorder and the switch on an uninterruptible power supply (UPS) so that recordings aren't lost during short power outages.
| Factor | IP cameras | AHD / CVI / TVI |
|---|---|---|
| Cabling | UTP network cable (Cat5e/6), powered via PoE | Coaxial cable + separate power supply |
| Power | Central, via a PoE switch | 12 V, central power supply or adapters |
| Maximum resolution | Practically no limit (4K and beyond) | Up to 4K – 8MP with the newer standards |
| Cable run length | Up to ~100 m per segment without extenders | Up to several hundred meters without significant quality loss |
| Image latency | Slight, from encoding | Almost none |
| Smart features | Built into the camera — faster, more flexible processing | Depend mainly on the recording device |
| Network security | Cameras are network devices: strong passwords and updates are needed | The camera isn't on the network, but a recorder with internet access carries the same risks |
| Expansion | Easy to add via a switch, if there are free ports and power | Limited by the recorder's channels and by free cables |
| Compatibility with existing cabling | Requires a network installation | Fits easily into an existing coaxial installation |
| Typical cost per point | Higher per camera, lower per "feature" | Lower entry cost |
The table shows typical situations; these are guidelines, not rules.
| Site | Often a suitable choice | Main reason |
|---|---|---|
| Small shop (2–4 cameras) | Analog HD if coax is already in place, IP for a new installation | The existing cable decides, not the technology |
| Office | IP | The network infrastructure exists, PoE simplifies installation |
| Warehouse or large yard | Depends on distances — analog on long runs or IP with intermediate switches | Run lengths and access to power |
| Home or house | Either option | Simplicity, clear zones, viewing from a phone |
| Upgrading an old analog installation | Hybrid recorder and new cameras, with IP at key points if needed | The cable is kept, the cost is lower |
| License-plate or face recognition | A purpose-built IP camera | High resolution and control over scene settings |
In short, an IP system makes sense for a new site without cabling infrastructure — you'll be running cable either way, and a network cable gives you more freedom later. The same applies when you need high resolution at specific points (entrances, tills, a parking lot) or plan integration with access control, analytics software or remote monitoring.
An analog system is the smarter choice when the site already has a coaxial installation from an older system — replacing just the cameras and the DVR is significantly cheaper than rewiring. It also suits a limited starting budget with room to expand in stages, or large distances between the cameras and the recorder where running a new network is difficult or costly.
Recording people is processing of personal data and carries responsibilities, regardless of the type of cameras. The general principles are simple: have a clear purpose (for example, protecting the property) and don't capture more than necessary. Aim the cameras so that they don't cover the street, neighboring properties, or areas such as toilets, changing rooms or rest areas. Many cameras allow zone masking (privacy mask).
Put up visible information signs at the entrance to the monitored area. Keep recordings only as long as the purpose requires, and limit access to them to specific people. Audio recording is more sensitive than video and is rarely justified. Employees must be informed if you monitor workplaces. The requirements depend on the type of site, so check the regulations currently in force and consult a lawyer if in doubt.
If you're not sure how to balance these questions for your site, the Select IT team can do a site survey and recommend a specific solution.
No. HD over coax is a perfectly workable solution, especially for replacing an old installation without rewiring. The limitations lie mainly in smart features and in how the system is expanded, not in picture quality.
No. The cameras record locally to the recorder. The internet is needed only for access from a phone or computer away from the site, which is a reason to take the security settings seriously.
Often yes, if they are in good condition and have no hidden splices. They are suitable for analog HD, and for IP, if you wish, with Ethernet-over-coax adapters. The cables should be checked on site before you decide.
There is no universal period. It is determined by the purpose of the surveillance and by the requirements that apply to your site, so check the regulations currently in force. The shorter the period, the fewer disks you need and the less data you store.
Yes, with a hybrid recorder that has both analog and IP channels. Check how many IP cameras it accepts and what its total throughput is, because that limits the number and resolution of the cameras.
Get a free site survey with us — we'll tell you honestly which solution fits your site and your budget.